We're about to make clip.Ops act as pointer areas, in which case we'd
like to contain the effect of PassOp to just pointer InputOps.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
The op.Save and Load methods exist to support the need for
transformation, clip, pointer area state to behave as stacks. For
example, layout needs to apply an offset to its children but not
subsequent operations.
Before this change, op.Save and Load were used to save and restore the
state:
ops := new(op.Ops)
// Save state.
state := op.Save(ops)
// Apply offset.
op.Offset(...).Add(ops)
// Draw with offset applied.
draw(ops)
// Restore state.
state.Load()
A drawback with the op.Save mechanism is that there is no direct
connection between the state change and the saving and loading of state.
This causes confusion as to when a Save/Load is needed and who is
responsible for performing them, which leads to subtle bugs and over-use
of Save/Loads.
This change gets rid of the general state stack and replaces it with
per-state stacks. There is now a stack for transformation, clip, pointer
areas, and they can only be restored by the code pushing state to them.
The example above now becomes:
ops := new(op.Ops)
// Push offset to the transformation stack.
stack := op.Offset(...).Push(ops)
// Draw with offset applied.
draw(ops)
// Restore state.
stack.Pop()
For convenience, transformation also be Add'ed if the stack operation is
not required.
Simple state such as the current material no longer has a way to be
restored; it is assumed the client of a PaintOp adds their desired
material operation before it.
API change: replace op.Save/Load with explicit Push/Pop scopes for
op.TransformOps, pointer.AreaOps, clip.Ops.
To ease porting, this change retains a version of op.Save/Load that
saves and restores the transformation and clip stacks. It also retains
an Add method for clip.Op.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
We're about to make operation scopes explicit, which would result in
both AreaOp and PassOp be scoped. However, PassOp seems to light to have
its separate stack, so this change instead makes pass-through a property
of an area. We're assuming that clients that want pass-through are also
aware of the affected hit area.
API change: replace PassOps with the AreaOp.PassThrough field.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
The semantics were relaxed in a previous commit; this change renames
to operations accordingly.
API change. Use gofmt to adjust your code accordingly:
gofmt -r 'op.Push(a).Pop() -> op.Save(a).Load()'
gofmt -r 'op.Push(a) -> op.Save(a)'
gofmt -r 'v.Pop() -> v.Load()'
gofmt -r 'op.StackOp -> op.StateOp'
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
This eliminates needless redraws for handlers that care about drag events and not move events, like gesture.Scroll.
Signed-off-by: Gordon Klaus <gordon.klaus@gmail.com>
It wasn't used, and it's not clear that it is useful at all in its current
form. For example, a single control with multiple handler keys (say, one for
scrolling and one for clicking) will only receive priority Foremost for one of
them.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Packages that provide support for external events such as pointer, key and
system are only the beginning. Future packages are expected for clipboard
access, drag and drop, gps positions and so on.
To keep the number of top-level packages under control, move such I/O packages
to the new `io` directory.
The `system` package name was the previous solution to keeping the number of
top-level packages under control: I named it `system` instead of the narrower
`profile` because I expected to put all the less common events into it, turning
`system` into a "package util" smell.
With `io`, package system can be renamed to `profile`.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Elias Naur