Package material's ad-hoc mulAlpha didn't take the sRGB color-space
into account, which meant that alpha-scaled colors were subtly wrong.
Introduce f32color.MulAlpha and convert all uses to it.
Thanks to René Post for finding and debugging the issue.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
This commit configures all remaining widgets to draw themselves in a disabled state
when their layout.Context is disabled. A description of the
strategy employed by each follows:
- Checkbox and RadioButton: Draws the icon component in a lighter color. Currently the label text is left
in its default color.
- ProgressBar: The "progress" color is lightened, but not as much as the background color. This makes the current progress value still readable.
- Editor: The cursor is no longer drawn and the text is lightened.
- Switch: The track is unchanged, but the circular "thumb" component is lightened.
Signed-off-by: Chris Waldon <christopher.waldon.dev@gmail.com>
Change the definition of Widget from the implicit
type Widget func()
to the explicit functional
type Widget func(gtx layout.Context) layout.Dimensions
The advantages are numerous:
- Clearer connection between the incoming context and the output dimensions.
- Returning the Dimensions are impossible to omit.
- Contexts passed by value, so its fields can be exported
and freely mutated by the program.
The only disadvantage is the longer function literals and the many "returns".
What tipped the scales in favour of the explicit Widget variant is that type
aliases can dramatically shorten the literals:
type (
C = layout.Context
D = layout.Dimensions
)
widget := func(gtx C) D {
...
}
Note that the aliases are not part of the Gio API and it is up to each user
whether they want to use them.
Finally the Go proposal for lightweight function literals,
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21498, may remove the disadvantage
completely in future.
Context becomes a plain struct with only public fields, and its Reset is
replaced by a NewContext convenience constructor.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Instead of
type Contraints struct {
Width, Height Constraint
}
use
type Constraints struct {
Min, Max image.Point
}
which leads to simpler use. For example, the Min method is trivally replaced by
the field, and the RigidConstraints constructor is no longer a net win.
API Change. Rewrites:
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Min() -> gtx.Constraints.Min'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Width.Min -> gtx.Constraints.Min.X'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Height.Min -> gtx.Constraints.Min.Y'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Height.Max -> gtx.Constraints.Max.Y'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Width.Max -> gtx.Constraints.Max.X'
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
There is nothing theme-specific about displaying images and icons,
so move the types from the material package to the generic widget
package.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
First, replace LayoutOptions with an explicit maximum width parameter. The
single-field option struct doesn't carry its weight, and I don't think we'll
see more global layout options in the future. Rather, I expect options to cover
spans of text or be part of a Font.
Second, replace the unit.Converter with an scaled text size. It's simpler and
allow the Editor and similar widgets to easily detect whether their cached
layouts are stale. Package text no longer depends on package unit, which is
now dealt with at the widget-level only.
Finally, remove the Size field from Font. It was a design mistake: a Font is
assumed to cover all sizes, as evidenced by the FontRegistry disregarding
Size when looking up fonts.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
It's one less type (Align) and shorter:
Before:
layout.Align(layout.Center).Layout(...)
After
layout.Center.Layout(...)
It is also safer: since `layout.Align(...)` was a casting operation,
the Go compiler would not complain about an incompatible constant.
For example, the widget/material package contained a wrong cast:
layout.Align(layout.Start)
which should have been
layout.Align(layout.W)
After this change, attempting `layout.Start.Layout(...)` result
in a compile error.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
With the simplification of MacroOp, it is now possible to simplify
the Flex API to just a single Layout method, similar to List:
layout.Flex{}.Layout(gtx,
layout.Rigid(func() { ... }),
layout.Flexed(0.5, func() { ... }),
)
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Elias Naur