This creates a floating-point analog to layout.Axis.Convert
for converting from (x,y) coordinate space to (main,cross)
coordinate space.
Signed-off-by: Chris Waldon <christopher.waldon.dev@gmail.com>
The semantics were relaxed in a previous commit; this change renames
to operations accordingly.
API change. Use gofmt to adjust your code accordingly:
gofmt -r 'op.Push(a).Pop() -> op.Save(a).Load()'
gofmt -r 'op.Push(a) -> op.Save(a)'
gofmt -r 'v.Pop() -> v.Load()'
gofmt -r 'op.StackOp -> op.StateOp'
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Added comment on the use of Dimension.Baseline and Direction.Layout constraint minimum clearing.
Also, renamed the Direction receiver for consistency and removed unnecessary conversions.
Signed-off-by: Pierre.Curto <pierre.curto@gmail.com>
Use op.Offset instead, or create and manipulate a f32.Affine2D.
API change. Update your code with a gofmt rule:
gofmt -r 'op.TransformOp{}.Offset -> op.Offset'
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Converting
macro := op.Record(ops)
...
macro.Stop()
macro.Add()
to
macro := op.Record(ops)
...
call := macro.Stop()
call.Add(ops)
Which is more general (call.Add can take a different ops than the op.Record
that started it), and enforced the order between Stop and the subsequent Add.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
The funcs replace stack.Push and macro.Record, which become private.
This makes stack and macro faster to write, in particular for stacks
where you can just write the following line to save and restore the
state :
defer op.Push(ops).Pop()
This usage requires Push to return a pointer (since Pop has a pointer
receiver), or else the code doesn't compile.
For consistancy, I tried to do the same for op.Record, but this implied
to turn all the MacroOp fields into pointers, and this caused some
panics. As a result, op.Record doesn't return a pointer.
An other side effect pointed by Larry Clapp: StackOp and MacroOp are not
re-usable any more, you have to allocate a new one for each usage, using
the described funcs above.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bruyelle <thomas.bruyelle@gmail.com>
Change the definition of Widget from the implicit
type Widget func()
to the explicit functional
type Widget func(gtx layout.Context) layout.Dimensions
The advantages are numerous:
- Clearer connection between the incoming context and the output dimensions.
- Returning the Dimensions are impossible to omit.
- Contexts passed by value, so its fields can be exported
and freely mutated by the program.
The only disadvantage is the longer function literals and the many "returns".
What tipped the scales in favour of the explicit Widget variant is that type
aliases can dramatically shorten the literals:
type (
C = layout.Context
D = layout.Dimensions
)
widget := func(gtx C) D {
...
}
Note that the aliases are not part of the Gio API and it is up to each user
whether they want to use them.
Finally the Go proposal for lightweight function literals,
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21498, may remove the disadvantage
completely in future.
Context becomes a plain struct with only public fields, and its Reset is
replaced by a NewContext convenience constructor.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
layout.FRect, layout.FPt for converting from integer to floating point,
useful for drawing operations.
f32.Pt is a shorthand that mirrors image.Pt.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Instead of
type Contraints struct {
Width, Height Constraint
}
use
type Constraints struct {
Min, Max image.Point
}
which leads to simpler use. For example, the Min method is trivally replaced by
the field, and the RigidConstraints constructor is no longer a net win.
API Change. Rewrites:
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Min() -> gtx.Constraints.Min'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Width.Min -> gtx.Constraints.Min.X'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Height.Min -> gtx.Constraints.Min.Y'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Height.Max -> gtx.Constraints.Max.Y'
gofmt -r 'gtx.Constraints.Width.Max -> gtx.Constraints.Max.X'
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
It's one less type (Align) and shorter:
Before:
layout.Align(layout.Center).Layout(...)
After
layout.Center.Layout(...)
It is also safer: since `layout.Align(...)` was a casting operation,
the Go compiler would not complain about an incompatible constant.
For example, the widget/material package contained a wrong cast:
layout.Align(layout.Start)
which should have been
layout.Align(layout.W)
After this change, attempting `layout.Start.Layout(...)` result
in a compile error.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
The ability to invoke other operation lists belongs in the new CallOp.
While we're here, make MacroOp.Add use a pointer receiver to match the
other methods.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Package app is the only package that depends on native libraries and
Cgo. Minimize its API, thereby minimizing Gio clients' dependency on
it. In the future, a headless, testing or remote "Window" should be
very easy to replace app.Window.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Taking a constraint in Reset smells too much of a layout operation,
whereas a size is simpler and only serves to set the context constraints
to something sensible.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Package ui is now only about units except for the Config.Now method.
Remove Now and rename Config to Converter. Add layout.Config to
replace the old ui.Config.
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
Chris Waldon